Software Evaluation Standards

I felt that reviewing software was using common sense. Some of the pointers given us were good, though. A few suggestions were given, such as: controllable pace of program, adjustable volume, quick running time, options for saving games and information, and print options. Some specific suggestions that were good to keep in mind were to have an uncluttered screen and a legible text. I would add that there is a difference between an uncluttered screen and a boring screen. I felt that the software my group reviewed, KidWord, was boring visually. It had dull colors, minimal sounds, one font, and virtually no graphics. I think students would learn from it but not be engaged by it.
I would be concerned about older adults using the program because the font didn’t seem adjustable to a larger size. Also, there wasn’t a teacher’s guide. The program simply stated that it was great for all ages. This is not a very clear statement. In fact, I looked up the California State Standards to see which, if any, our software met. It seemed to primarily satisfy K-2, but that could be because the demo I downloaded had many features unavailable without a subscription, including higher levels of the program.
Overall, the software evaluation was a learning experience. I don’t know how much time I will actually spend reviewing software as an educator, however. I suppose it will depend on the funds available to purchase software.